Anna Zinola received a PhD in Research Metho
Cuore di Milano (Italy), where she now teaches Research Methods. She is professor of Fashion Consumer Behavior at Master Courses of Istituto Marangoni Milan. At the same university she is Scientific Director for the master in Marketing and Communication for Fragrances and Cosmetics. Before her current appointments, she has been professor of Marketing Psychology at the University of Pavia. Before her academic achievements, Anna has been director of qualitative studies at Nielsen. In the subsequent years she embarked on a career as a consultant and worked for international companies, primarily in the Luxury and Fast-Moving Consumer Goods sectors. Her research and scientific activities are mainly devoted to consumer behaviors and research methods. She has spent the last 20 years analyzing the attitude and consume behaviors in the particular sectors of fashion and luxury goods. Furthermore, she is a regular columnist for the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera - consumer related topics.

Carlos Gago Rodriguez is an Art director, Fashion Buyer and Academic Researcher focused on the synergies between physical reality and e-commerce. He has worked in different major Italian fashion luxury brands like La Perla and a long-time experience in Max Mara as a Retail Event Coordinator and Fashion Coordinator Assistant.
Currently, Carlos as a fashion consultant develops 360° bespoke strategies such as trend forecasting, creative direction and Omnichannel Development for brands like Bogner, Puma, or Bulgari, among many others.

Sara Kaufman is a fashion writer and independent researcher. Her words have been published by Damn, WeAr Global Magazine, Rivista Studio, Sleek and Vestoj and the Fashion Studies Journal
among others. Her research topics revolve around the expression of social matters in fashion.




 


Some of us have played with her for years, some still collect her, and some abandoned her early on. Some of us adored creating clothes for her, while others enjoyed removing her heads. Loved or hated, perceived as a style icon, or experienced as the most mundane of stereotypes, it is not (yet?) quite possible to ignore Barbie. The famous Mattel doll, invented in 1959 as a pop evolution of traditional fashion dolls, is still very much a part of the collective imaginary, and even more so for those who work in fashion. But what are her actual influences on the stylistic choices of designers, stylists, photographers, and all those involved in fashion-making? Has she influenced their aesthetics, and how?

The purpose of this paper is to explore the influence that Barbie has had on the creation of an imaginary and, consequently, on the aesthetic and stylistic choices of a selected group of creatives.

Specifically, the authors conducted 24 qualitative interviews with professionals diversified by field of expertise (photography, fashion design, styling, etc.), geographical provenance, and age group; interviews focused on both micro (personal experiences) and macro (impacts on aesthetic and stylistic choices) dimensions.

Each interviewee was assigned a number, from 1 to 24. A table, reported at the end of the paper, identifies the main characteristics of each interviewee (gender, age, geographic area, profession within the fashion field.)


An icon for everyone


Analysis of the interviews clearly shows how Barbie served as a reference for literally everyone. All the interviewees know her, and all have played with her at least once.

This aspect is universal across all the considered variables: age (from under 25 to over 55), gender (identifying as men, women, or nonbinary), country of origin (Europe, US, Latin America, Middle East, Asia), and profession (designers, managers, stylists, teachers, etc.).

"I've always played with Barbie; it was a classic. I had other toys, of course, and I had dolls as well as other games, but I always came back to Barbie." (4)

"Everyone knows Barbie. As a doll, it wasn't as widespread in China but still everyone knows her, and I had at least a couple of them." (10)

"I was a bit of a tomboy, and I liked more physical games, but I still played with Barbie. It was a way to bring out my creative side, even though I didn't know it at the time." (7)

"Those who haven’t played with Barbie haven't had a real childhood!" (24)

Within this common framework, an interesting element emerges: for men over 55, playing with Barbie had a somewhat subversive element, as back then it was (and still is) considered primarily a feminine activity.

"I played a lot with Barbie as a child, and I'm glad that my parents allowed me to do so, and even bought me several." (6)

Some of the male interviewees (mainly the ones over 55 years old) acknowledge that they sometimes played in secret, or shared them with the girls in their family, as if doing so somehow legitimized (or masked) their desire to play with them.

"I really liked it, but I was a bit ashamed, and I didn't want to be noticed because, at the time, it was considered a girls' game. There was this mentality: boys play with guns and soldiers, and girls play with dolls." (9)

"I have two sisters, and I used to dress up with their Barbies. I had a lot of fun, and I would often ask them if I could play with their Barbies, and they were a little annoyed." (19)

What changes significantly from one interviewee to the next, is the kind of Barbie that they played with, and this is where the age variable is relevant. Women and men over 55 remember playing with the “classic” Barbies or, at most, with one from a different ethnicity from the original White one; however, these had absolutely no differences in terms of body type.

Karl Lagerfeld Barbie. Image courtesy of Mattel.

"The typical Barbie, the blonde one with blue eyes, was called Barbie Malibu. I still remember the box, I remember the scent it had, how it was made, perfect, with a slim waist and narrow hips, a long neck, and slender hands." (16)

"She was the blonde Barbie; I don't know why in my imagination she was German, probably because of the colors." (15)

"At some point, there was the Hawaiian Barbie, who wasn't the classic blonde but she still had a classic physique." (3)

The younger the age, the more different are the types of Barbies owned or remembered. This diversity includes not only different ethnicities and, to some extent, body types, but also different professions, since the Barbies on offer had evolved to featuring different kinds of “working Barbies” (doctor, astronaut, pilot, veterinarian, pastry chef, etc.).

"I had many Barbies of different ethnicities, although at the time, I probably didn't pay much attention to it. I mean, I didn't really think about it; they were just Barbies to me." (23)

"My favorite was the vet Barbie; she came with a dog and all a set of professional tools. But I also had the pastry chef Barbie." (1)

"There was a boom in Barbies with different professions. I had the teacher Barbie, and the doctor Barbie. I was envious of a friend who had the pilot Barbie." (21)

In particular, some interviewees remember Barbie models dressed by famous brands such as Dior, Burberry, and Benetton; the latter had a lot of success in Italy, the brand’s homeland.

"I remember the Benetton Barbie, colorful. I remember her  because I liked her, but I never got one. When I received another Barbie, dressed as a bride, which may have cost even more, I cried a lot" (13)

"I went crazy for the Dior one, with the distressed  jacket and the flared skirt. I didn't know it at the time, but that was actually Dior's post-war 'New Look'" (2)

"One Christmas, I received the Burberry one, with the trench coat and the bag and the classic white-and-beige checked pattern" (12)

Another significant element related to age is the presence, or not, of dolls perceived as Baribie’s competitors. For people over 35-40, Barbie is the fashion doll by definition. Some mentioned knock-offs, but these were not really perceived as competitors.

"There were some cheaper copies, but Barbie was the original one, the one everyone wanted." (22)

However, for those under 35, there are other fashion dolls besides Barbie  that, while not entirely challenging Barbie's supremacy, entered their imagination.

"At one point, the Bratz came out. I really liked them, but my mother didn't want to buy them for me because she said they were gross. In fact, they were a bit excessive, with very large lips that look plumped, heavy makeup, prominent cheekbones, curls. Even the clothes were a bit over the top: wedge shoes, very short dresses, and body-con outfits. In hindsight, they somewhat foreshadowed the Kardashian style, I guess." (1)

"Not just Barbie, there were also the Bratz and the Winx, and then the Disney princesses." (14)

The Guo Pei Barbie based on Rihanna’s 2015 Met Gala look, an example of the creative exchange between the doll and design professionals. Photo by Brian Centrone.

The fashion alphabet


For all the interviewees, Barbie was a tool for getting closer to fashion, specifically to understand and recognize key fashion styles. Through her outfits (and thanks to them), they learned what it meant to have a casual, formal, classic, or streetwear style. Almost without realizing it, they grasped which clothing items, colors, and details defined and identified these styles.

"At the time, and maybe it's still the same, they sold outfits for Barbie. These included everything: dress, shoes, bag, necklace, earrings. And there were various styles, such as Casual Barbie, Party Barbie, Holiday Barbie, Fancy Barbie, Cocktail Barbie, and so on. You associated the definitions with the characteristics, so you realized that Casual Barbie dressed in a certain way, and that Party Barbie was different from Holiday Barbie." (5)

"I understood what a cocktail dress was thanks to one Barbie’s cocktail gown. It was a dress made in a specific way, with a specific cut and shape, to be paired with specific accessories." (17)

"Barbie made me aware of fashion, without me even realizing. I understood what it meant to have a formal and an informal style because certain colors belonged to one style and not the other. Although her outfits were generally colorful, there were still differences." (8)

"The set of daily clothes for Casual Barbie was very different from the one of Party Barbie, even though everything was mostly pink and glossy. There were differences that a child would notice and internalize." (23)

Interviewees reported that, while playing with Barbie, not only did they learn about the features and staples of the most common clothing styles, they also internalized the concept of  "Total Look."

"Barbie is a precursor of what later became known as the 'total look.' She was sold as a 'total look.' Bride Barbie is perhaps the best example, but the same could be said for Causal Barbie or Office Barbie. It was a complete set" (11)

"The Barbie clothing sets are, indeed, sets. Everything is already defined, a bit like today when you go to a store and the shop assistants get you everything… They sell you the dress, but they also try to sell you matching shoes or the jacket that goes well with that dress. Or you try on a top and, while you're in the fitting room, the shop assistant brings you the matching skirt. Barbie had already figured this out." (18)

"The ready-made Barbie outfits from my time, and I believe they still exist, were a bit like the displays in mono-brand stores, with all the items already matched, including a bag, boots, and even a scarf." (20)


“Barbie has not only been a way to learn the fashion alphabet; for many of the interviewees,  she was also the tool to discover and express creativity.”


A creative exercise


Barbie has not only been a way to learn the fashion alphabet; for many of the interviewees, she was also the  tool to discover and express creativity. Playing with Barbie meant, first and foremost, playing with clothes and accessories. This allowed them to unleash their creative flair, to hone and enhance it.

"The fun was in changing her clothes. I would say: 'Now it's evening, and she's going to a ball,’ and then I dressed her up, matching the shoes, the bag, the necklace, and the earrings, and even putting a crown on her head." (7)

"I used to invent stories and change the outfits, even though, of course, I didn't call them outfits. I matched the outfits to the stories. It was a bit like styling, although, of course, I didn't call it styling, and I didn't even know what it was." (10)

"I liked to combine different things. I'd put her in jeans, but with a somewhat serious blouse and Texan boots... I remember my sister being a bit jealous of my skills. She'd say, 'You do it since you are good at these things,' and I felt very proud." (19)

“There were ready-made outfits, like I remember the ones for cocktails or parties or beach parties, but I didn't like them. What I liked was to mix & match, taking a piece here and combining it with one from there... I would take an Oriental dress, like a geisha, and pair it with some very chunky shoes or boots” (4)

For most interviewees, the creation of a style went beyond the definition of an outfit to include hair and makeup.

"I did it all: I chose the clothes, shoes, bag, and jewelry, and then I combed her hair, and applied lipstick with markers." (7)

"Styling her hair was a lot of fun. I'd give her all sorts of hairstyles. I even cut the hair of a couple of Barbies. My mom got angry because I'd cut it short, but I liked it." (14)

"I was crazy about Holiday Barbie, but I didn't like her hair because it was puffy. So I combed it to try to straighten it and give her a middle parting, which I thought looked cooler." (1)

The creative part of playing with Barbie didn't just involve mixing, matching, and styling—it also encompassed the design and creation of Barbie's clothes. A substantial number of interviewees stated that they "made" some clothes and accessories for Barbie, either by themselves or with the help of adults.

"I had this basic knitting machine that produced knitted tubes, and I'd make dresses, which were essentially tubes. Then, I'd decorate them with beads or pins. It was all very naïve but fun and, looking back, also quite creative." (24)

"My grandmother crocheted the clothes for me. I'd draw them, and she'd make them, and together we'd add details such as buttons." (17)

"I liked the Collector's outfits, such as the Scarlett O'Hara's dress made from curtains, because they were more carefully and elaborately made. I didn't like the others and preferred to make them myself using what I had, fabric scraps, shoelaces, pins, buttons. I had a box with all these things and I literally created the outfits." (12)

For some interviewees, this was a necessity because Barbie's clothes were quite expensive; for others it was a personal initiative unrelated to a real need.

"My family wasn't well-off, and I had a Barbie, which was already a luxury. So I made my own clothes, sometimes with the help of an aunt who knew how to sew a bit. Thinking back, I was lucky because this aunt helped me, and I had the opportunity to create a customized wardrobe, which is what everyone wants today. But, to be honest, I didn't feel lucky at the time; I felt less fortunate than others because they all had the same stuff, and I did not." (6)

"My parents bought me Barbie clothes, but I didn't like them. Those clothes bored me; everyone had them, they were in bright, cloying colors. I wanted something different so I started making them myself, initially in a very basic way and then getting better over time. I'd use fabric scraps that I found at home and that was really fun. Perhaps - and I only realize this now - I didn't like Barbie's clothes because of the materials. They felt unpleasant, synthetic to the touch, and that's why I searched for better fabrics, like leftover silk from a dress my mother had altered or a piece of an old brocade curtain that had been replaced." (18)

Some interviewees point out that their creativity was enhanced by swapping clothes and accessories, which, according to them, was quite common.

"We did this all the time with my cousins. We'd swap Barbie's clothes, and there was a real bargaining. If you give me the evening dress, I'll give you the daytime dress with the jacket, things like that. It was fun and allowed us to change Barbie's style and discover new combinations we wouldn't have thought of on our own." (2)

"Here's a funny story: I used to play with a school friend. We were kids, and we'd swap Barbie's clothes. We were good friends, but then she never returned a Barbie dress that I really loved because it was red, long, with tulle and a stole, and I thought it looked super chic. Anyway, she never returned it, and I don't know why I never asked her, or maybe I did ask her, and she said, 'Yes, I'll bring it to you,' but she never did. So, our friendship ended, because of Barbie's dress!" (21)

It’s important to note that all these creative activities—whether it was styling or designing and making clothes—primarily related to Barbie. All the dolls and fictional characters who created Barbie’s entourage were not involved in this creative process. They were, however, occasionally mentioned by the interviewees; Skipper, Midge, and Stacey appear in the stories of a few 45+ individuals, while Krissy, Belinda, and Leah are mentioned by a few under 45 .

"The fashion doll was Barbie. I mean, I had other dolls like Skipper, who I think was her sister or cousin, but I did not care, I dressed her the same way every time." (9)

"Barbie had a lot of clothes, but the others didn't. It was like Barbie was the princess, and the others were the plain sisters. She was always the bride and the others were always the bridesmaids. I wasn't interested in dressing them up; perhaps I also tried not to dress them too nicely because I didn't want them to overshadow Barbie." (8)

Even Ken didn’t receive the same creative attention that Barbie did. Those who had Ken (about two-thirds of the interviewees) didn't really focus on his outfits, which tended to be basic, nor did they dedicate time and energy to creating new clothes for him. This has probably a lot to do with the fact that, at the time in which our interviewees played with their Barbies and Kens, most children were unfamiliar with the idea of gender-fluid dressing, nor were they  exposed to cross-dressing or gender neutrality—with rare exception, boys dressed as boys, men dressed as men,  and Ken dressed as Ken.

"I don't remember how I dressed Ken. I probably put him in a pair of pants and a shirt, or a t-shirt. He was just an accessory for my Barbies at the time. I always saw him as a sort of toy boy." (13)

"Ken had some clothes, but not many. I certainly never thought of making clothes for Ken because there was less room for imagination. What fun could I possibly have had in making a shirt for him? On the other hand, with Barbie I could let my creativity run wild!" (18)

"My Ken had a Hawaiian shirt, a pair of long pants, and one pair of shorts, and that's it. Barbie, on the other hand, had three boxes full of clothes, but Ken's clothes didn't interest me because he was marginal. He existed in relation to Barbie. Dressing him simply had the purpose of not leaving him naked, but it wasn't meaningful. In this regard, I have to say, the quote from Greta Gerwig’s Barbie movie stating, ‘Ken is just Ken,’ is actually right. That's how it was for me." (20)

Only one interviewee recalls concentrating on Ken's outfits for a period.

"I had Barbie, but then I asked my parents to buy me a Ken, and I started dressing him. There was a lady who worked as a seamstress and she made clothes for my Ken. I got passionate about it for a while, but then I grew tired of it. At that point, I actually stopped playing with Barbies and Ken altogether." (3)


Barbie fashion design toy kit. Image from ToysRUs.

“Barbie made me aware of fashion, without me even realizing.”

From doll to lifestyle


For all interviewees, Barbie was never just a doll; she's associated with a wide range of related products that significantly contribute to creating the doll's world and its related collective imagery.

Among the most frequently mentioned items are means of transportation (car, scooter, bike, boat) and various versions of Barbie houses (villa, apartment, beach house, treehouse, etc.)

"I had several Barbie cars to play with, from the white convertible Jeep with a pink roof to the Testarossa Pininfarina Spider, which was red and not pink!" (20)

"I had a Barbie house with an elevator. All the rooms, everything inside it was pink, with tiny furniture, cups, pots, bathroom accessories, and more." (16)

"What defined Barbie, at least for me, was the luxurious lifestyle that allowed her to have so many houses: one on the lake, one in Malibu, the downtown apartment, and even a treehouse." (5)

Less frequently mentioned but still considered, are the pool, the camper van, the restaurant, the closet, the plane, and the helicopter.

"I had the camper van, and I used to play with it a lot. Now it seems a bit strange to me that someone like Barbie, always so impeccably dressed, would go camping. My Barbie used to go camping in a long dress, but at the time it didn't seem like a contradiction to me." (23)

"There was everything, and probably there's even more today. I remember there was the house, the pool, the car, and the plane." (13)

"I had the catamaran, and to be honest I didn't even know what it was exactly, but I knew it was a sort of boat, like a speedboat, and I used it to take my Barbie anywhere." (2)

For the interviewees, these products also played a pivotal role in igniting creativity and defining an aesthetic.

"I put the Barbies in the car, and they arrived in Paris (where I myself had never been) and there was their house. Then I opened the pages of books and art catalogs and used them to create backdrops for the imaginary art galleries and museums in which my Barbies would go. I combined Barbie accessories with what I crafted, and created a story, a world." (11)

"I remember having the pink Barbie car, and with that my Barbie visited cities, palaces, and castles. I imagined very glamorous and sophisticated vacations." (15)

"Like with the clothes, I added my own touch also to the house. I removed some elements and added others. I remember using a china tea set for dolls that I found at my grandmother's house. It was probably too big for Barbie, but I liked it better than the pink plastic one." (22)

"I never had the house but I had the pool. I built the house by myself around the pool and I organized parties with only women, only Barbies, no Kens or other dolls. In my imagination, it was a very exclusive club." (4)

"I inherited Barbie's restaurant from someone, perhaps from the daughter of one of my mother's friends. I transformed it into a house because I didn't like the idea of Barbie running a restaurant. I saw her doing a different job, a more creative and posh job." (1)

In addition to allowing them to develop their creativity, these products introduced the interviewees to the concept of lifestyle. Barbie’s house, her car, her pool, instilled in them, though not in an entirely conscious way, the idea that fashion is not just about clothing but it’s an overall style, a way of living that includes all aspects of life (from how one decorates their home, to the vacation destinations they have, the people they hang out with, etc.).

Conclusion


Among the fashion creatives in the interviewed sample, Barbie influenced the creation of an imaginary world and, consequently, aesthetic and stylistic choices. Hers was not merely an influence related to stylistic elements, but a broader and, in some ways, deeper influence that affected their relationship with fashion.

For almost all the interviewees, Barbie has been an essential tool to understanding and becoming familiar with concepts closely related to the fashion system. Thanks to Barbie and her world, they approached, absorbed, and internalized concepts that would later become relevant to their work.

In particular, Barbie allowed them to: recognize and understand many of the major fashion styles (classic, casual, formal, streetwear, etc.), grasp some of the key concepts related to fashion (such as the idea of a total look or the idea of lifestyle), and understand the meaning of styling, as well as experimenting with mixing clothing, accessories, hair, and makeup styles.

These insights originated from a qualitative study involving a limited number of participants (24 fashion professionals diversified by field of expertise, geographical provenance, and age group). It would be interesting to check these insights on a larger scale through a survey, in order to test which of them had the greatest impact and on which category of professionals.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the professionals who were interviewed and who shared and offered their experience and insights.



Participant information
ID number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Gender

F
F
M
F
M
M
F
F
M
F
M
F
F
M
F
F
M
M
M
F
M
M
F
F
Age

<25
46-55
>55
25-35
36-45
>55
36-45
36-45
>55
25-35
<25
36-45
46-55
25-35
>55
>55
25-35
<25
>55
36-45
25-3546-55
<25
36-45
Geographic Area

Italy
Turkey
France
US
UAE
Italy
Argentina
Saudi Arabia
Canada
China
China
US
Germany
Japan
Russia
Italy
Peru
South Korea
Italy
Italy
Brazil
China
Georgia
Italy
Professional Field

Social media
Product mgmt
Brand mgmt
Styling/photo
Buying
Education
Design
Design
Communication
Styling
Social media
Retail mgmt
Education
Styling
Design
Education
Social media
Styling
Brand mgmt
Communication
Design
Buying
Styling
Education
 


Issue 13 ︎︎︎ Fashion & Politics
Issue 12 ︎︎︎ Border Garments: Fashion, Feminisms, & Disobedience

Issue 11 ︎︎︎ Fashion & Digital Engagement
Issue 10 ︎︎︎ Fashion & Partnership

Issue 9 ︎︎︎ Fall 2021

Issue 8 ︎︎︎ Fashion & Mental Health

Issue 7 ︎︎︎ Fashion & Motherhood

Issue 6 ︎︎︎ Fall 2020

Issue 5 ︎︎︎ The Industry

Issue 4 ︎︎︎ Summer 2017

Issue 3 ︎︎︎ Spring 2017

Issue 2 ︎︎︎ Winter 2016

Issue 1 ︎︎︎ Fall 2016


Issue 13 ︎︎︎ Fashion & Politics



Issue 11 ︎︎︎ Fashion & Digital Engagement


Issue 10 ︎︎︎ Fashion & Partnership


Issue 9 ︎︎︎ Fall 2021


Issue 8 ︎︎︎ Fashion & Mental Health


Issue 7 ︎︎︎ Fashion & Motherhood


Issue 6 ︎︎︎ Fall 2020


Issue 5 ︎︎︎ The Industry


Issue 4 ︎︎︎ Summer 2017


Issue 3 ︎︎︎ Spring 2017


Issue 2 ︎︎︎ Winter 2016


Issue 1 ︎︎︎ Fall 2016